TDs’ occupations: teachers rule the roost

7 November, 2010

Those who can, do;  those who can’t, teach.  So the old saying goes.  But in Ireland it seems that the noble profession of teaching is not only a refuge for the can’t-do-it brigade, but it also is a stepping stone to occupying a seat in Dáil Éireann. 

I invite you to study the breakdown of our current TDs by profession (for instance by visiting this Google Doc).  It is a bit alarming.  There are 39 who are/were teachers or lecturers, 16 lawyers, 19 farmers. And very few with real business experience.  No wonder we are in a mess.

Part of the reason why the Dáil is infested with teachers is that they can get indefinite leave of absence from their permanent teaching job to chase and occupy a Dáil seat, and their cushy post will be kept warm for them by inserting a series of poor unfortunate temporary teachers.   This can go on for years, even decades.

This over-representation of teachers in parliament, and lack of people with business experience, is another reason why our electoral system needs to change.

Ed Walsh wrote tellingly about this problem last July, in the Irish Times:-

“………… The intense crisis that now engulfs us highlights the deficiencies of Ireland’s system of governance. Talent is the glaring deficit. The 15 people who currently serve as Government Ministers are well-intentioned, hard-working people but generally undistinguished in terms of expertise, experience or achievement. Not one of the many Irish people who have proven themselves internationally serves in government…..

There is some management experience at the Cabinet table: Éamon Ó Cuív managed a Gaeltacht co-operative; Eamon Ryan has a commerce degree and ran a bicycle shop and tour business; and John Gormley owned a language school. But more than half the members were in education (six teachers, one guidance counsellor, one lecturer), one is a social worker and three are lawyers.   …… I can find no evidence that a Fianna Fáil Minister has a business qualification. A company with such an unimpressive board of directors would find it difficult to attract investment or be taken seriously.

An analysis of Opposition front benches suggests that a change of government would not much alter the talent and experience deficit. Similar large numbers of primary and secondary teachers would dominate…..

None of the new democracies of central Europe chose to adopt the Irish electoral system. All decided to introduce some form of list system, which provides a means by which national movers and shakers can be brought into government. Typically half the seats in parliament are reserved for those who are elected, as in our case, from local constituencies and the other half from lists of well-known national figures.

As a result, when the prime minister goes to appoint ministers a wide range of proven talent and experience can be drawn upon. The list system reduces clientism and ministers can take difficult decisions with less concern about re-election. They are released from the distraction and burden of constituency work and can give undivided attention to the ministerial job and the challenge of government……”

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: