We have to talk ……. about Population Control

17 February, 2010

There was an interesting comment piece in the Irish Times on Tuesday, “Rising populations are at core of overseas aid issue” .  My main reaction to it was one of mild surprise that a respected establishment organ was providing a platform for what, for some peculiar reason, seems to be treated as if it were a radical, minority, viewpoint: that we should try to do something about world population growth.  Bizarrely, it seems politically incorrect to advocate population control, even the sort of voluntary control policies advocated by the Optimum Population Trust (OPT)  .

 This quasi-taboo was referred to in a Financial Times editorial last September: 

“For too long population control has been virtually absent from international political discourse. Leaders have been reluctant to raise the issue for several reasons. One is fear of the powerful religious lobbies opposed to contraception. Another is the unfortunate legacy of some over-enthusiastic family planning campaigns in the past, such as India’s in the 1970s….But several factors are now coming together to put family planning back on the global agenda where it belongs. The most immediate is climate change.”

 The link between climate change and overpopulation should be almost too obvious to be mentioned.  Here’s what OPT have to say: 

“All serious environmentalists know perfectly well that population growth, exploding in the 20th century, has been a key driver of every environmental problem. It’s a fact, not an opinion, that total human impact is the average per person multiplied by the number of people.

“Yet for far too long, governments and environmental NGOs have observed a taboo – invented in the 1980s by a bizarre coalition of the religious right and the liberal left – on stating this obvious fact. So they keep on implying that our numbers can grow forever with no ill effects. It’s a ‘silent lie’ and by encouraging us to ignore the vital need to stabilise our numbers by humane means (contraception) before nature does it for us by inhumane, natural means (famine, disease, war) this absurd taboo betrays our children.”

David Attenborough, the world’s best-known natural history filmmaker, is now adding his voice to those who are calling for action, and has become a patron of OPT.  This was mentioned in another sensible Irish Times piece last July, called “Planet is buckling under weight of people”:

“Behind every threat to the natural world, he says, is ‘the frightening explosion in human numbers . . . I’ve never seen a problem that wouldn’t be easier to solve with fewer people, or harder – and ultimately impossible – with more.’”

According to the WWF (World Wide Fund For Nature), since the late 1980s the Earth’s regenerative capacity can no longer keep up with demand – people are turning resources into waste faster than nature can turn waste back into resources.

And recycling isn’t going to crack this on its own. The Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) has calculated that the net benefit of recycling household waste for the average UK citizen, in terms of its effect on ecological footprint,  is 0.07gha (Global Hectares) per capita (and presumably the effect in Ireland is similar).  The ecological footprint is the amount of biologically productive land and sea area needed to regenerate the resources a human population consumes and to absorb and render harmless the corresponding waste.

So while recycling is laudable, its impact is small compared to the figure for the total average UK Footprint per capita, of 5.6 gha (Global hectares).  Effectively, the benefit of a lifetime of recycling is equivalent for the UK to less than 1.25% of the negative impact of one additional member of the population or, to put it another way,  it takes 80 lifetimes of recycling to counteract the ecological damage caused by a typical citizen.

The taboo of talking about limiting population growth is a luxury we can’t afford.  Or, more accurately, it’s a luxury our children and grandchildren won’t be able to afford.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “We have to talk ……. about Population Control”

  1. Bob Says:

    There’s a way to get population control done, with everyone winning. For those in the Third World: offer women, who are over the age of 16, and not yet had a child, $10,000 to be sterilized. If they have had 1 child, the payout is $5,000. For those with 3 kids, $1,000. No one gets anything after menopause. For women in the US, increase the above amounts by a factor of 5.

  2. Bron Says:

    Shame that you have been fooled by the global warming advocates – haven’t you heard of Climategate?

    Educate yourself here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/

    And anyone who advocates population control ought to lead by example.

  3. Bob Says:

    So… Do you put mustard on that corporate media sandwich, before swallowing it?

    Do you remember seeing paintings (done in the 1600’s) of folks in Europe ice skating on frozen rivers? That was during a ‘mini ice age’, caused by a decrease of sunspot activity and collateral decrease of the sun’s enery output. It’s called the Maunder Minimum.

    See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum
    And: http://reference.findtarget.com/search/Little%20Ice%20Age/

    Well, sunspot activity is once again decreasing, and not just as part of the sun’s 11-year cycle. For the past few years, the sun’s energy output is beginning to approximate the earlier Maunder Minimum.

    And Still, global temperatures are increasing. We’re in for a whole lotta hot.

    But at least Exxon/Mobile is making a bundle. And they’re using some of it to convince folks like you, that it just ain’t happinin.

    I guess, it was money well spent.

    Have a nice day.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: